Model index · Text · text generation · standard · Mistral · released 2025-02-17
Saba pricing
Served by 2 providers from $0.3000 to $0.3000 per 1M tokens on the standard tier.
Mistral Saba is a 24B-parameter language model specifically designed for the Middle East and South Asia, delivering accurate and contextually relevant responses while maintaining efficient performance. Trained on curated regional...
Mistral · first published 2025-02-17 · Text model · text generation · 33k context · description as published by the source, not written by us
$0.3000
Cheapest standard /1M — Mistral
33k
Native context window
2
Providers serving it
—
Quality not measured yet
Quality not measured yet
We measure models on request rather than pre-scoring the whole catalog, so this one has no score yet. Absence of a score is not a low score.
Every provider and service tier
Standard on-demand rows first, cheapest of each group first. Tiers are not interchangeable — see the note below the table.
| Provider | In /1M | Out /1M | Blended /1M | Tier | Region | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral cheapest standard | $0.2000 | $0.6000 | $0.3000 | standard | — | third_party |
| OpenRouter (default route) * resells other hosts | $0.2000 | $0.6000 | $0.3000 | standard | — | provider_api |
* OpenRouter chooses a host for each request, and the figure above is what its default choice costs — not a fixed rate for this model. Selecting a specific host through the same account costs whatever that host charges, which is why this row can sit above or below the hosts listed beside it. Token rates are passed through from the underlying provider with no markup, so the per-1M price above is what that host charges directly — OpenRouter's own charge sits on funding instead: 5.5% (min $0.80) by Stripe or 5% by Coinbase to buy credits, 5% of the equivalent spend if you bring your own provider key. So budget about 5% above the rate shown unless you already hold credit. Fee schedule.
Compare Saba with alternatives
One model per vendor, ordered by how prominent the vendor is and how many independent providers serve the model — hosts only carry what customers ask for, so that is a real demand signal. This is not traffic or popularity data, which we do not have. Every alternative below does the same job — text generation — because a price comparison between a generator and, say, an upscaler is arithmetic rather than advice. Prices on both sides are standard on-demand rates, so the comparison is like for like — a discounted batch or flex rate is never shown against another model’s standard rate.
| Alternative | Vendor | $/1M | vs Saba | Quality | Kind | Context | Hosts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct | Alibaba | $0.2681 Alibaba | 11% cheaper | 60/100 | standard open weights | 262k | 9 |
| GPT-4o-mini | OpenAI | $0.2625 OpenAI | 13% cheaper | 40/100 | standard | 128k | 3 |
| Nova Lite 1.0 | Amazon | $0.1050 OpenRouter (default route) | 65% cheaper | 40/100 | standard | 300k | 2 |
| WizardLM-2 8x22B | Microsoft | $0.4800 DeepInfra | 60% dearer | 100/100 | standard | 66k | 3 |
| Kimi K2 0905 | MoonshotAI | $1.00 OpenRouter (default route) | 234% dearer | not measured | standard | 262k | 2 |
| Command R (08-2024) | Cohere | $0.2625 Cohere | 13% cheaper | not measured | standard | 128k | 1 |
| Llama 3.1 8B Instruct | Meta | $0.0250 DeepInfra | 92% cheaper | not measured | standard open weights | 131k | 6 |
| DeepSeek V3 0324 | DeepSeek | $0.4050 DeepInfra | 35% dearer | not measured | standard | 164k | 4 |
Prices are the cheapest host for each model, blended at a 3:1 input:output ratio. "Quality" is our own probe suite where we have run it — see what it measures. A cheaper alternative is only a real saving if it also passes on the capability your workload needs.
5 of these alternatives cost less than Saba — the cheapest being Llama 3.1 8B Instruct at $0.0250 per 1M tokens blended (92% cheaper).
Cheaper is not automatically better: check the quality column, and confirm the context window and capabilities your workload depends on before switching.
Before you switch
Identical weights do not guarantee identical output. Check that the cheaper host serves the model at full precision rather than a quantised copy, that its context window matches what you need, and that its rate limits carry your peak traffic. A cheaper host that cannot take your throughput is not cheaper — it is an outage.
Move to Mistral without a rewrite
VernaOne fronts every provider on this page with one API, so switching host is a config change — with automatic fallback if quality or latency regresses.
Try VernaOne free →Frequently asked
How much does Saba cost?
The cheapest standard-tier provider is Mistral at $0.3000 per 1M tokens blended (3:1 input:output). Prices change often; verify with the provider before budgeting.
Which provider is best for Saba?
Cheapest is not automatically best. Compare quantisation (a lossy copy of the weights changes output), the context window each host actually serves, and rate limits. Where a provider serves less context than the model's native window we flag it in the table above.
Can I switch providers for Saba without changing code?
Yes, if you route through an abstraction. VernaOne exposes one API across every provider listed here, so switching host is a config change and you keep automatic fallback if the new one degrades.
← All models · Generated catalog of AI models and every provider that serves them, with normalised prices in USD per 1,000,000 tokens. Blended prices assume a 3:1 input:output ratio.