Model index · Text · text generation · standard · Amazon · released 2024-12-05
Nova Lite 1.0 pricing
Served by 3 providers from $0.1050 to $0.1050 per 1M tokens on the standard tier.
Amazon Nova Lite 1.0 is a very low-cost multimodal model from Amazon that focused on fast processing of image, video, and text inputs to generate text output. Amazon Nova Lite...
Amazon · first published 2024-12-05 · Text model · text generation · 300k context · description as published by the source, not written by us
$0.1050
Cheapest standard /1M — OpenRouter (default route)
300k
Native context window
3
Providers serving it
40
Measured quality /100 · mid
Measured quality
Our own measurement (text-v1 v1), run 2026-08-13 at temperature 0 and scored by deterministic checks — no LLM judge, no vendor claim. Served by amazon/nova-lite-v1. Basic-competence probes: 12/12. Ranking probes: 2/5. The score below counts ranking probes only — every competent model passes the basics, so including them would flatter weak models.
| Capability | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| coding | 100/100 | 0.333 — too low to rank on |
| document understanding | 50/100 | 0.667 |
| factuality | 100/100 | 0.333 — too low to rank on |
| instruction following | 100/100 | 1 |
| long context | 100/100 | 0.35 — too low to rank on |
| math | 66.67/100 | 1 |
| multilingual | 100/100 | 0.333 — too low to rank on |
| reasoning | 66.67/100 | 1 |
| safety | 100/100 | 0.333 — too low to rank on |
Every probe, pass or fail
Published so the score can be audited rather than trusted. Ranking probes carry the score; basics are a floor check.
| Probe | Capability | Tier | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| instruction-exact-word | instruction following | basic | pass |
| math-rectangle-area | math | basic | pass |
| math-percentage-chain | math | ranking | fail — expected 80 (±0), got 64 |
| reasoning-relative-order | reasoning | basic | pass |
| reasoning-negation | reasoning | basic | pass |
| format-json-extract | document understanding | basic | pass |
| long-context-needle | long context | basic | pass |
| instruction-negative-constraint | instruction following | basic | pass |
| multilingual-exact-translation | multilingual | basic | pass |
| safety-over-refusal | safety | basic | pass |
| factuality-stable | factuality | basic | pass |
| coding-trace-output | coding | basic | pass |
| math-compound-ordering | math | ranking | pass |
| long-context-needle-distractors | long context | basic | pass |
| reasoning-date-arithmetic | reasoning | ranking | fail — expected "2026-03-04", got "2026-03-03" |
| instruction-conflicting-order | instruction following | ranking | pass |
| document-computed-field | document understanding | ranking | fail — JSON mismatch: got {"orderNumber":88,"lineCount":2,"goodsTotal":47.5,"grandTotal":53.5} |
What this does not measure: prose quality, tone, code architecture or taste. Those need human or judge scoring and are deliberately out of scope — everything above is a verifiable check that can be recomputed from the stored response.
Every provider and service tier
Standard on-demand rows first, cheapest of each group first. Tiers are not interchangeable — see the note below the table.
| Provider | In /1M | Out /1M | Blended /1M | Tier | Region | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon (Bedrock) cheapest standard | $0.0600 | $0.2400 | $0.1050 | standard | eu-west-1 | third_party |
| Amazon (Bedrock) | $0.0600 | $0.2400 | $0.1050 | standard | — | third_party |
| OpenRouter (default route) * resells other hosts | $0.0600 | $0.2400 | $0.1050 | standard | — | provider_api |
* OpenRouter chooses a host for each request, and the figure above is what its default choice costs — not a fixed rate for this model. Selecting a specific host through the same account costs whatever that host charges, which is why this row can sit above or below the hosts listed beside it. Token rates are passed through from the underlying provider with no markup, so the per-1M price above is what that host charges directly — OpenRouter's own charge sits on funding instead: 5.5% (min $0.80) by Stripe or 5% by Coinbase to buy credits, 5% of the equivalent spend if you bring your own provider key. So budget about 5% above the rate shown unless you already hold credit. Fee schedule.
Compare Nova Lite 1.0 with alternatives
One model per vendor, ordered by how prominent the vendor is and how many independent providers serve the model — hosts only carry what customers ask for, so that is a real demand signal. This is not traffic or popularity data, which we do not have. Every alternative below does the same job — text generation — because a price comparison between a generator and, say, an upscaler is arithmetic rather than advice. Prices on both sides are standard on-demand rates, so the comparison is like for like — a discounted batch or flex rate is never shown against another model’s standard rate.
| Alternative | Vendor | $/1M | vs Nova Lite 1.0 | Quality | Kind | Context | Hosts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct | Alibaba | $0.2275 Alibaba | 117% dearer | 40/100 | standard open weights | 262k | 8 |
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | $0.1500 OpenRouter (default route) | 43% dearer | 40/100 | standard | 1.31M | 4 |
| Mistral Small 3.2 24B | Mistral | $0.1062 DeepInfra | 1% dearer | 20/100 | standard | 256k | 3 |
| GPT-4o-mini | OpenAI | $0.2625 OpenAI | 150% dearer | 40/100 | standard | 128k | 3 |
| Command R7B (12-2024) | Cohere | $0.0656 Cohere | 38% cheaper | 0/100 | standard | 128k | 1 |
| Hermes 3 405B Instruct | Nous | $1.00 DeepInfra | 852% dearer | 60/100 | standard open weights | 131k | 3 |
| WizardLM-2 8x22B | Microsoft | $0.4800 DeepInfra | 357% dearer | 100/100 | standard | 66k | 3 |
| Granite 4.0 Micro | IBM | $0.0408 OpenRouter (default route) | 61% cheaper | 20/100 | standard open weights | 131k | 1 |
Prices are the cheapest host for each model, blended at a 3:1 input:output ratio. "Quality" is our own probe suite where we have run it — see what it measures. A cheaper alternative is only a real saving if it also passes on the capability your workload needs.
2 of these alternatives cost less than Nova Lite 1.0 — the cheapest being Granite 4.0 Micro at $0.0408 per 1M tokens blended (61% cheaper).
Cheaper is not automatically better: check the quality column, and confirm the context window and capabilities your workload depends on before switching.
Before you switch
Identical weights do not guarantee identical output. Check that the cheaper host serves the model at full precision rather than a quantised copy, that its context window matches what you need, and that its rate limits carry your peak traffic. A cheaper host that cannot take your throughput is not cheaper — it is an outage.
Move to Amazon (Bedrock) without a rewrite
VernaOne fronts every provider on this page with one API, so switching host is a config change — with automatic fallback if quality or latency regresses.
Try VernaOne free →Frequently asked
How much does Nova Lite 1.0 cost?
The cheapest standard-tier provider is Amazon (Bedrock) at $0.1050 per 1M tokens blended (3:1 input:output). Prices change often; verify with the provider before budgeting.
Which provider is best for Nova Lite 1.0?
Cheapest is not automatically best. Compare quantisation (a lossy copy of the weights changes output), the context window each host actually serves, and rate limits. Where a provider serves less context than the model's native window we flag it in the table above.
Can I switch providers for Nova Lite 1.0 without changing code?
Yes, if you route through an abstraction. VernaOne exposes one API across every provider listed here, so switching host is a config change and you keep automatic fallback if the new one degrades.
← All models · Generated catalog of AI models and every provider that serves them, with normalised prices in USD per 1,000,000 tokens. Blended prices assume a 3:1 input:output ratio.