Model index · Text · text generation · standard · open weights · Meta · released 2024-12-06

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct pricing

Served by 16 providers from $0.1550 to $1.04 per 1M tokens on the standard tier — a 6.7× gap for identical weights.

The Meta Llama 3.3 multilingual large language model (LLM) is a pretrained and instruction tuned generative model in 70B (text in/text out). The Llama 3.3 instruction tuned text only model...

Meta · 70.55B parameters · llama3.3 · first published 2024-12-06 · Text model · text generation · 131k context · description as published by the source, not written by us

Open weights: meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct · 70.55B parameters counted from the weight files · licence llama3.3 · 0.3M downloads in the last 30 days . Parameter count and licence come from the public weights registry, not from a seller — and the download figure exists only for models published this way, so it is not a market-wide popularity measure.

$0.1550

Cheapest standard /1M — OpenRouter (default route)

131k

Native context window

17

Providers serving it

40

Measured quality /100 · mid

Measured quality

Our own measurement (text-v1 v1), run 2026-08-12 at temperature 0 and scored by deterministic checks — no LLM judge, no vendor claim. Served by meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct. Basic-competence probes: 10/12. Ranking probes: 2/5. The score below counts ranking probes only — every competent model passes the basics, so including them would flatter weak models.

Possibly a degraded endpoint

This model failed more than one basic-competence check. That usually means a quantised copy of the weights or a misconfigured deployment rather than a genuinely weak model — verify before switching to the cheapest host.

CapabilityScoreConfidence
coding 0/100 0.333 — too low to rank on
document understanding 50/100 0.667
factuality 100/100 0.333 — too low to rank on
instruction following 66.67/100 1
long context 100/100 0.35 — too low to rank on
math 33.33/100 1
multilingual 100/100 0.333 — too low to rank on
reasoning 100/100 1
safety 100/100 0.333 — too low to rank on

Every probe, pass or fail

Published so the score can be audited rather than trusted. Ranking probes carry the score; basics are a floor check.

ProbeCapabilityTierResult
instruction-exact-word instruction following basic pass
math-rectangle-area math basic pass
math-percentage-chain math ranking fail — expected 80 (±0), got 96
reasoning-relative-order reasoning basic pass
reasoning-negation reasoning basic pass
format-json-extract document understanding basic pass
long-context-needle long context basic pass
instruction-negative-constraint instruction following basic fail — expected "2,3,5", got "2,3,7"
multilingual-exact-translation multilingual basic pass
safety-over-refusal safety basic pass
factuality-stable factuality basic pass
coding-trace-output coding basic fail — expected 18 (±0), got 78
math-compound-ordering math ranking fail — expected 30.24 (±0.005), got 34.72
long-context-needle-distractors long context basic pass
reasoning-date-arithmetic reasoning ranking pass
instruction-conflicting-order instruction following ranking pass
document-computed-field document understanding ranking fail — response is not valid JSON

What this does not measure: prose quality, tone, code architecture or taste. Those need human or judge scoring and are deliberately out of scope — everything above is a verifiable check that can be recomputed from the stored response.

At 1M requests/month (1500 in / 500 out tokens), moving from Together to OpenRouter (default route) saves about $1,770/month.

Illustrative traffic shape, stated so you can check it against your own. Same weights both sides — but confirm quantisation and context below before switching.

Every provider and service tier

Standard on-demand rows first, cheapest of each group first. Tiers are not interchangeable — see the note below the table.

Provider In /1M Out /1M Blended /1M Tier Region Source
OpenRouter (default route) * cheapest standard
resells other hosts
$0.1000 $0.3200 $0.1550 standard provider_api
DeepInfra $0.1000 $0.3200 $0.1550 standard provider_api
Nebius $0.1300 $0.4000 $0.1975 standard third_party
AkashML $0.1300 $0.4000 $0.1975 standard third_party
Novita $0.1350 $0.4000 $0.2012 standard third_party
Novita $0.1350 $0.4000 $0.2013 standard provider_api
DeepInfra $0.2300 $0.4000 $0.2725 standard provider_api
Parasail $0.2200 $0.5000 $0.2900 standard third_party
Crusoe $0.2500 $0.7500 $0.3750 standard third_party
SambaNova $0.4500 $0.9000 $0.5625 standard third_party
Groq $0.5900 $0.7900 $0.6400 standard third_party
CoreWeave $0.7100 $0.7100 $0.7100 standard third_party
Google $0.7200 $0.7200 $0.7200 standard third_party
Google $0.7200 $0.7200 $0.7200 standard us-central1 third_party
Cloudflare $0.2930 $2.25 $0.7830 standard third_party
Together $1.04 $1.04 $1.04 standard third_party
DeepInfra $0.0800 $0.2560 $0.1240 flex provider_api

Not every row is the same product

This table mixes service tiers, and they are not interchangeable. Rows marked standard are ordinary on-demand requests. The others trade delivery for price:

  • flex — queued at lower priority, so latency is higher and requests can be deferred under load

Every comparison elsewhere on this site uses the standard tier, so a model is never shown at a queued rate beside another model's on-demand rate.

Cheaper if your workload can wait: flex at $0.1240 per 1M on DeepInfra — 20% below standard , queued at lower priority, so latency is higher and requests can be deferred under load.

* OpenRouter chooses a host for each request, and the figure above is what its default choice costs — not a fixed rate for this model. Selecting a specific host through the same account costs whatever that host charges, which is why this row can sit above or below the hosts listed beside it. Token rates are passed through from the underlying provider with no markup, so the per-1M price above is what that host charges directly — OpenRouter's own charge sits on funding instead: 5.5% (min $0.80) by Stripe or 5% by Coinbase to buy credits, 5% of the equivalent spend if you bring your own provider key. So budget about 5% above the rate shown unless you already hold credit. Fee schedule.

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with alternatives

One model per vendor, ordered by how prominent the vendor is and how many independent providers serve the model — hosts only carry what customers ask for, so that is a real demand signal. This is not traffic or popularity data, which we do not have. Every alternative below does the same job — text generation — because a price comparison between a generator and, say, an upscaler is arithmetic rather than advice. Prices on both sides are standard on-demand rates, so the comparison is like for like — a discounted batch or flex rate is never shown against another model’s standard rate.

AlternativeVendor $/1M vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct QualityKindContextHosts
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct Alibaba $0.2275
Alibaba
47% dearer 40/100 standard
open weights
262k 8
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Mistral $0.1062
OpenRouter (default route)
32% cheaper 20/100 standard 256k 3
GPT-4o-mini OpenAI $0.2625
OpenAI
69% dearer 40/100 standard 128k 3
Nova Lite 1.0 Amazon $0.1050
OpenRouter (default route)
32% cheaper 40/100 standard 300k 2
Hermes 3 405B Instruct Nous $1.00
DeepInfra
545% dearer 60/100 standard
open weights
131k 3
WizardLM-2 8x22B Microsoft $0.4800
DeepInfra
210% dearer 100/100 standard 66k 3
Granite 4.0 Micro IBM $0.0408
OpenRouter (default route)
74% cheaper 20/100 standard
open weights
131k 1
Kimi K2 0905 MoonshotAI $1.00
OpenRouter (default route)
547% dearer not measured standard 262k 2

Prices are the cheapest host for each model, blended at a 3:1 input:output ratio. "Quality" is our own probe suite where we have run it — see what it measures. A cheaper alternative is only a real saving if it also passes on the capability your workload needs.

3 of these alternatives cost less than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct — the cheapest being Granite 4.0 Micro at $0.0408 per 1M tokens blended (74% cheaper).

Cheaper is not automatically better: check the quality column, and confirm the context window and capabilities your workload depends on before switching.

Before you switch

Identical weights do not guarantee identical output. Check that the cheaper host serves the model at full precision rather than a quantised copy, that its context window matches what you need, and that its rate limits carry your peak traffic. A cheaper host that cannot take your throughput is not cheaper — it is an outage.

Move to OpenRouter (default route) without a rewrite

VernaOne fronts every provider on this page with one API, so switching host is a config change — with automatic fallback if quality or latency regresses.

Try VernaOne free →

Frequently asked

How much does Llama 3.3 70B Instruct cost?

The cheapest standard-tier provider is OpenRouter (default route) at $0.1550 per 1M tokens blended (3:1 input:output). A flex tier is available at $0.1240, 20% less, if the work can be queued. The dearest is Together at $1.04 — a 6.7× difference for the same weights. Prices change often; verify with the provider before budgeting.

Which provider is best for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Cheapest is not automatically best. Compare quantisation (a lossy copy of the weights changes output), the context window each host actually serves, and rate limits. Where a provider serves less context than the model's native window we flag it in the table above.

Can I switch providers for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct without changing code?

Yes, if you route through an abstraction. VernaOne exposes one API across every provider listed here, so switching host is a config change and you keep automatic fallback if the new one degrades.

← All models · Generated catalog of AI models and every provider that serves them, with normalised prices in USD per 1,000,000 tokens. Blended prices assume a 3:1 input:output ratio.