Model index · Text · text generation · reasoning · Anthropic · released 2026-07-24

Claude Opus 5 pricing

Served by 11 providers from $10.00 to $11.00 per 1M tokens on the standard tier — a 1.1× gap for identical weights.

A reasoning model — the headline price is not the whole bill

This model thinks before it answers, and those thinking tokens are billed at the output rate while never appearing in the response. A request can therefore cost several times what the per-1M figure suggests, and the multiplier depends on your prompts rather than on anything we can publish. Compare it against other reasoning models — the alternatives below are ordered to put those first.

Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic’s flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work. It is particularly strong at end-to-end software tasks, code review and bug finding, visual analysis...

Anthropic · first published 2026-07-24 · Text model · text generation · 1M context · description as published by the source, not written by us

$10.00

Cheapest standard /1M — Anthropic

1M

Native context window

12

Providers serving it

100

Measured quality /100 · frontier

Measured quality

Our own measurement (text-v1 v1), run 2026-08-12 at temperature 0 and scored by deterministic checks — no LLM judge, no vendor claim. Served by anthropic/claude-opus-5. Basic-competence probes: 9/9 passed — only 9 of 12 could be run. Ranking probes: 4/4 passed — only 4 of 5 could be run. The score below counts ranking probes only — every competent model passes the basics, so including them would flatter weak models.

Incomplete run

of the 17 probes could not be executed — the provider returned an error rather than an answer, so those checks are missing rather than failed. Ratios above are passes out of probes that actually ran, not out of the full suite.

CapabilityScoreConfidence
coding 100/100 0.333 — too low to rank on
document understanding 100/100 0.667
factuality 100/100 0.333 — too low to rank on
instruction following 66.67/100 1
long context 100/100 0.35 — too low to rank on
math 100/100 1
multilingual 100/100 0.333 — too low to rank on
reasoning 0/100 1
safety 100/100 0.333 — too low to rank on

Every probe, pass or fail

Published so the score can be audited rather than trusted. Ranking probes carry the score; basics are a floor check.

ProbeCapabilityTierResult
instruction-exact-word instruction following basic pass
math-rectangle-area math basic pass
math-percentage-chain math ranking pass
reasoning-relative-order reasoning basic fail — model returned no visible content (reasoning-only response)
reasoning-negation reasoning basic fail — model returned no visible content (reasoning-only response)
format-json-extract document understanding basic pass
long-context-needle long context basic pass
instruction-negative-constraint instruction following basic fail — model returned no visible content (reasoning-only response)
multilingual-exact-translation multilingual basic pass
safety-over-refusal safety basic pass
factuality-stable factuality basic pass
coding-trace-output coding basic pass
math-compound-ordering math ranking pass
long-context-needle-distractors long context basic pass
reasoning-date-arithmetic reasoning ranking fail — model returned no visible content (reasoning-only response)
instruction-conflicting-order instruction following ranking pass
document-computed-field document understanding ranking pass

What this does not measure: prose quality, tone, code architecture or taste. Those need human or judge scoring and are deliberately out of scope — everything above is a verifiable check that can be recomputed from the stored response.

At 1M requests/month (1500 in / 500 out tokens), moving from Google to Amazon (Bedrock) saves about $2,000/month.

Illustrative traffic shape, stated so you can check it against your own. Same weights both sides — but confirm quantisation and context below before switching.

Every provider and service tier

Standard on-demand rows first, cheapest of each group first. Tiers are not interchangeable — see the note below the table.

Provider In /1M Out /1M Blended /1M Tier Region Source
Amazon (Bedrock) cheapest standard $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard third_party
Claude Platform on AWS $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard third_party
Anthropic $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard official_docs
Amazon (Bedrock) $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard third_party
Google $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard third_party
Azure $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard third_party
OpenRouter (default route) *
resells other hosts
$5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard provider_api
DeepInfra $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 standard provider_api
Amazon (Bedrock) $5.50 $27.50 $11.00 standard us-east-1 third_party
Google $5.50 $27.50 $11.00 standard third_party
Google $5.50 $27.50 $11.00 standard us third_party
OpenRouter (default route) *
resells other hosts
$2.50 $12.50 $5.00 batch provider_api

Not every row is the same product

This table mixes service tiers, and they are not interchangeable. Rows marked standard are ordinary on-demand requests. The others trade delivery for price:

  • batch — submitted as a batch and collected later, typically within 24 hours — not for interactive use

Every comparison elsewhere on this site uses the standard tier, so a model is never shown at a queued rate beside another model's on-demand rate.

Cheaper if your workload can wait: batch at $5.00 per 1M on OpenRouter — 50% below standard , submitted as a batch and collected later, typically within 24 hours — not for interactive use.

* OpenRouter chooses a host for each request, and the figure above is what its default choice costs — not a fixed rate for this model. Selecting a specific host through the same account costs whatever that host charges, which is why this row can sit above or below the hosts listed beside it. Token rates are passed through from the underlying provider with no markup, so the per-1M price above is what that host charges directly — OpenRouter's own charge sits on funding instead: 5.5% (min $0.80) by Stripe or 5% by Coinbase to buy credits, 5% of the equivalent spend if you bring your own provider key. So budget about 5% above the rate shown unless you already hold credit. Fee schedule.

Compare Claude Opus 5 with alternatives

One model per vendor, ordered by how prominent the vendor is and how many independent providers serve the model — hosts only carry what customers ask for, so that is a real demand signal. This is not traffic or popularity data, which we do not have. Every alternative below does the same job — text generation — because a price comparison between a generator and, say, an upscaler is arithmetic rather than advice. Prices on both sides are standard on-demand rates, so the comparison is like for like — a discounted batch or flex rate is never shown against another model’s standard rate.

AlternativeVendor $/1M vs Claude Opus 5 QualityKindContextHosts
DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek $0.5281
Baidu
95% cheaper 100/100 reasoning
open weights
1.05M 19
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google $0.4250
Google
96% cheaper 100/100 reasoning 1.05M 7
GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI $0.2250
OpenAI
98% cheaper 100/100 reasoning 1.05M 7
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Alibaba $1.21
DeepInfra
88% cheaper 100/100 reasoning
open weights
131k 4
Grok 4.3 xAI $1.56
xAI
84% cheaper 100/100 reasoning 1M 4
Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral $3.00
Mistral
70% cheaper not measured reasoning 262k 1
Kimi K3 MoonshotAI $5.60
Morph
44% cheaper not measured reasoning
open weights
1.05M 16
GLM 5V Turbo Z.ai $1.90
OpenRouter (default route)
81% cheaper not measured reasoning 203k 1

Prices are the cheapest host for each model, blended at a 3:1 input:output ratio. "Quality" is our own probe suite where we have run it — see what it measures. A cheaper alternative is only a real saving if it also passes on the capability your workload needs.

8 of these alternatives cost less than Claude Opus 5 — the cheapest being GPT-5.6 Luna at $0.2250 per 1M tokens blended (98% cheaper).

Cheaper is not automatically better: check the quality column, and confirm the context window and capabilities your workload depends on before switching.

Before you switch

Identical weights do not guarantee identical output. Check that the cheaper host serves the model at full precision rather than a quantised copy, that its context window matches what you need, and that its rate limits carry your peak traffic. A cheaper host that cannot take your throughput is not cheaper — it is an outage.

Move to Amazon (Bedrock) without a rewrite

VernaOne fronts every provider on this page with one API, so switching host is a config change — with automatic fallback if quality or latency regresses.

Try VernaOne free →

Frequently asked

How much does Claude Opus 5 cost?

The cheapest standard-tier provider is Amazon (Bedrock) at $10.00 per 1M tokens blended (3:1 input:output). A batch tier is available at $5.00, 50% less, if the work can be collected later. Prices change often; verify with the provider before budgeting.

Which provider is best for Claude Opus 5?

Cheapest is not automatically best. Compare quantisation (a lossy copy of the weights changes output), the context window each host actually serves, and rate limits. Where a provider serves less context than the model's native window we flag it in the table above.

Can I switch providers for Claude Opus 5 without changing code?

Yes, if you route through an abstraction. VernaOne exposes one API across every provider listed here, so switching host is a config change and you keep automatic fallback if the new one degrades.

← All models · Generated catalog of AI models and every provider that serves them, with normalised prices in USD per 1,000,000 tokens. Blended prices assume a 3:1 input:output ratio.